"It's made from my point of view," said Keith Allen as he
defended his film about Princess Diana's death, Unlawful Killing. "It's
what the French call being an auteur."
Every so often a little
invented scandal blows into Cannes; a harmless, or not so harmless,
flurry of carefully created media noise for a film that, while nothing
to do with the festival's official programme, uses Cannes to lever in
credibility by association.
So it was with this new film by Allen,
an actor who once appeared in Shallow Grave. It is being touted as the
film you will never see in Britain – lawyers have demanded 87 cuts
before it can be certificated. Some may say: lucky Britain.
When
Allen uttered his "auteur" line there were titters in the grand salon of
the Carlton Hotel in Cannes, where the press had been assembled to hear
details of what Allen believes is an establishment cover-up of the true
import of the inquest into the deaths of Diana, Princess of Wales
and Dodi Fayed. He also described the film as "forensic" and "not
sensational" – perhaps forgetting that it contains an interview in which
psychologist Oliver James opines that Prince Philip is a "psychopath".
And
then there is the business of the film's financing. Mohamed Al Fayed,
it transpired, was its sole but unacknowledged backer, to the tune of
£2.5m. He is also the film's mainstay, his well-publicised views on the
royal family rehearsed at length. "I don't know at what point in the
film I would have told the audience it was financed by Mohamed Al
Fayed," said Allen. "It would have interrupted the flow of the film. A
lot of films coming out of America are financed by the mafia – but they
don't acknowledge that."
The film, which also includes interviews
with a well-nigh incoherent Tony Curtis as well as Piers Morgan and
Kitty Kelley, aims to show the establishment conspired to "talk to each
other and square their stories" about Dodi and Diana. The collusion of
British journalists was explained by the notion that they "answer to
editors who answer to proprietors who all want knighthoods". (There was
also a genuinely funny moment reconstructing an episode in which poor
Nicholas Witchell, the BBC royal correspondent, apparently dropped off
while watching the inquest proceedings.)
Other key evidence for
this conspiracy included the fact that QCs swear allegiance to the
crown, ergo cannot be impartial on the royal family (presumably with the
exception of Michael Mansfield, Fayed's lawyer, who was interviewed for
the film). And the royal family themselves? "Gangsters in tiaras", we
were told.
The most arresting, and unintentionally comic, passage
came at the end of the film, when Fayed was shown making a large but
rather unsuccessful bonfire in his Surrey garden using the vast "by
royal appointment" crests that once adorned the facade of Harrods. He
is, confirmed his spokesman Conor Nolan, "delighted with the film".
卫报的报道