ychee吧 关注:10贴子:708
  • 5回复贴,共1

Venezuela 1-0 Argentina: Sabella switches to three at the back

只看楼主收藏回复

加油 一场比赛不能说明什么 几年来无球跑动的缺乏 球队没有一个统一的整体 打法 这些都不是一朝一夕可以改变的。。。我相信萨贝拉


1楼2011-10-15 20:06回复
    Selection
    The problem, rather, was the players he used within the formation. Bringing in Demichelis, amusingly described by one Argentine journalist as a ’synonym of doubt’, was a dreadful decision. The system wasn’t a cause for defensive nervousness, but Demichelis’ clumsiness was. If a back three was needed, then perhaps Zabaleta could have been brought in from the right – not ideal, but more reliable than Demichelis. A more natural centre-back would have been Federico Fernandez – it’s odd that Sabella is so keen to include his ex-Estudiantes players, but chose to play Demichelis over Fernandez.
    Marcos Rojo did well down the left, but a more attack-minded player than Zabaleta could have been used down the right. Argentina were likely to be dominating the ball and needing thrust down the flanks. Jonas Gutierrez could have been used here, for example. Zabaleta is a willing runner, but very much a full-back shoved forward and poor in the final third. A combination of a natural left-back and a natural winger (Rojo and Gutierrez) may have been a nice balance on the flanks.
    The real problem was in midfield. Mascherano was the holder, and the freest player on the pitch. He’s not known for his distribution, but did well on the ball – hitting nice passes out to Rojo on the left. Ahead of him was the confusion, as Angel Di Maria was moved back to a central midfield role that didn’t suit his qualities at all. He likes to drift from out to in, picking the ball up on the move and running at speed. Here, he was occupied by Tomas Rincon and contributed little.
    The role of Jose Sosa was particularly baffling. What was he meant to be? Slightly left-sided, ahead of the midfield, deeper than Messi. Presumably he was meant to drift in from the left to join up with the front two, but then why not give that role to Di Maria, and play a true passer (like the dropped Banega) alongside Mascherano? It made little sense, especially considering the trio of Di Maria, Messi and Higuain combined well against Chile. That was broken up. At least Sosa distracted Cesar Gonzalez and Roberto Rosales slightly, allowing Rojo space which Zabaleta didn’t get on the other flank.
    


    4楼2011-10-15 20:22
    回复
      问题在于 选择球员 德米 是一个可怕的决定 他的笨拙导致了防守线上的紧张 萨巴莱塔或许比德米更可靠
      罗霍在左侧做得不错 但是比萨巴莱塔更具攻击性 阿根廷控球需要依靠两侧 一个边锋和一个边后卫或许是一个更好的选择
      真正的问题在中场 小马是the holder 场上自由度最大的人 但他不会distribution 但是可以很好的将球传给左后卫罗霍 较靠前的位置让他困惑。
      天使是一个回撤中场的角色 完全不适应 他不断的回撤和插上 他的位置被 Rincon占用而贡献不大
      索萨的角色令人费解 中场略左 在梅西后 大概是联系左路和前场两人 但是为什么不是天使来打这个位置呢?让一个真正的分球组织型后腰在小马旁边?对智利的梅西 天使 西瓜的三重奏因此被打破


      5楼2011-10-15 20:43
      回复
        小马on the ball不错 但是不能一个 playmaker 阿根廷需要需找一个中场distributor 天使和索萨的位置混乱导致他们两个完全的迷失
        萨贝拉不应该因为阵型而遭受指责 而他的用人应该被批评。。
        翻得很仓促 只是练英语的目的


        7楼2011-10-15 20:52
        回复
          从战术小黑板看 索萨和前场两人的联系完全靠天使的插上和梅西的回撤 但是位置被rincon lucena卡住 加之索萨的能力 球队因此脱节 梅西和伊瓜因在前场完全孤立无援 进攻也屡屡在左边路终结。。


          IP属地:重庆9楼2011-10-16 00:52
          回复

            显示不出来 又不能删除。。o()^))o 唉



            10楼2011-10-16 01:11
            回复